Who Is Exchanging Information
Three parties take part in every request, and each has a different worry to settle before any financial information moves.
The Attorney Needs a Complete Record
In lieu of a subpoena duces tecum — the order that commands a bank to produce records — the attorney sends a secure, one-time link asking for account statements and transaction history. Making the request is the easy part. Completeness is not: an account the other side rarely mentions is easy to miss, and a two-month gap in a stack of statements announces nothing. A discovery record is only as good as what it includes.
The Account Holder Stays in Control
Whoever receives that request needs a straightforward way to answer — grant access, and withdraw it just as easily later. Nothing about the grant is permanent or one-directional.
The Bank Verifies Before It Shares
The bank wants to honor its customer’s wishes, but it cannot take a request at face value. Before any data moves, it confirms that the party asking is the one the account holder actually authorized — not merely someone who claims to be.
One permission system settles all three concerns at once. The connection itself runs through Plaid — see Where the Data Is Stored .